charm AT lists.cs.illinois.edu

Subject: Charm++ parallel programming system

List archive

Re: [charm] [ppl] [ppl-local] Q on Entry method

From: Phil Miller <mille121 AT illinois.edu>
To: "Kale, Laxmikant V" <kale AT illinois.edu>
Cc: Charm Mailing List <charm AT cs.illinois.edu>, Nikhil Jain <nikhil.life AT gmail.com>, "Miller, Philip B" <mille121 AT illinois.edu>
Subject: Re: [charm] [ppl] [ppl-local] Q on Entry method
Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2012 19:47:46 -0600
List-archive: <http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/charm/>
List-id: CHARM parallel programming system <charm.cs.uiuc.edu>

That should be just fine. I believe we do it in charm LU, and maybe in amr. Will check when I'm not on my phone.

On Dec 28, 2012 7:18 PM, "Kale, Laxmikant V" <kale AT illinois.edu> wrote:

And to cover another case: you should not haver a single method occur in
when blocks of two different sdag entry methods. (please confirm, and add
to documentation, one of you).

On 12/29/12 1:25 AM, "Phil Miller" <mille121 AT illinois.edu> wrote:

>On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 1:43 P...
>_______________________________________________
>charm mailing list
>charm AT cs.uiuc.edu
>http://list...

Re: [charm] [ppl] [ppl-local] Q on Entry method, Nikhil Jain, 12/28/2012
- Re: [charm] [ppl] [ppl-local] Q on Entry method, Phil Miller, 12/28/2012
  - Re: [charm] [ppl] [ppl-local] Q on Entry method, Kale, Laxmikant V, 12/28/2012
  - Message not available
    - Re: [charm] [ppl] [ppl-local] Q on Entry method, Phil Miller, 12/28/2012
      - Re: [charm] [ppl] [ppl-local] Q on Entry method, Phil Miller, 12/29/2012
        
        Re: [charm] [ppl] [ppl-local] Q on Entry method, Kale, Laxmikant V, 12/29/2012
        
        Message not available
        
        Re: [charm] [ppl] [ppl-local] Q on Entry method, Phil Miller, 12/29/2012