Charm++ parallel programming system

[Phil Miller <mille121 AT illinois.edu>]

On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 2:55 PM, Jim Phillips <jim AT ks.uiuc.edu> wrote:

You can probably write a runscript to do this.  -Jim

I don't think a wrapper script would be effective, at least not on a net* build, because the runtime internally redirects those FDs through a pipe that it then sends to charmrun. The problem is that when the program crashes, there can be unflushed data in that pipe that one will never see. In my case, I'm using AddressSanitizer and expecting output as the process dies, and I'm guaranteed not to see that reach charmrun.
 

On Wed, 8 Jan 2014, Phil Miller wrote:

Before I go digging into the source code, is there an easy and
already-implemented way of telling the runtime system to direct each
process's standard output and standard error streams to a separate file?