charm AT lists.cs.illinois.edu

Subject: Charm++ parallel programming system

List archive

[charm] #define Classname_SDAG_CODE even if there is no SDAG code

From: Robert Steinke <rsteinke AT uwyo.edu>
To: Charm Mailing List <charm AT cs.illinois.edu>
Subject: [charm] #define Classname_SDAG_CODE even if there is no SDAG code
Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2015 08:30:26 -0600
Authentication-results: cs.illinois.edu; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;
List-archive: <http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/charm/>
List-id: CHARM parallel programming system <charm.cs.uiuc.edu>

I have a suggestion. Could Charm++ #define Classname_SDAG_CODE to be blank if there is no SDAG code? Currently it isn't defined at all so it generates a compiler error if you put Classname_SDAG_CODE in a chare that has no SDAG code. This is inconvenient if I'm writing a chare that I know will have SDAG code, but I haven't gotten to that yet, and I want to check that what I have done so far compiles. Sure, I could leave out the Classname_SDAG_CODE for now, but then I have to remember to go back and add it later. It seems like defining it to be blank wouldn't do any harm, and programmers could just make a habit of putting Classname_SDAG_CODE in every Chare class without having to think about whether it needs it or not.

Bob Steinke

[charm] #define Classname_SDAG_CODE even if there is no SDAG code, Robert Steinke, 04/01/2015
- Re: [charm] #define Classname_SDAG_CODE even if there is no SDAG code, Phil Miller, 04/01/2015