charm AT lists.cs.illinois.edu

Subject: Charm++ parallel programming system

List archive

Re: [charm] Load balancing database accounting with CkLoop

From: Harshitha Menon <gplkrsh2 AT illinois.edu>
To: "Miller, Philip B" <mille121 AT illinois.edu>
Cc: Charm Mailing List <charm AT cs.illinois.edu>
Subject: Re: [charm] Load balancing database accounting with CkLoop
Date: Wed, 6 May 2015 09:47:08 -0500
List-archive: <http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/charm/>
List-id: CHARM parallel programming system <charm.cs.uiuc.edu>

Currently hat is not the case. The execution time on other worker threads gets attributed as background load.

On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 9:39 AM, Miller, Philip B <mille121 AT illinois.edu> wrote:

When using CkLoop, I would expect that the total execution time summed across all worker threads gets attributed to the object that generated the work. Is that how it currently works?

http://harshithamenon.com/

[charm] Load balancing database accounting with CkLoop, Phil Miller, 05/06/2015
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: [charm] Load balancing database accounting with CkLoop, Harshitha Menon, 05/06/2015