Charm++ parallel programming system

[Eric Bohm <ebohm AT illinois.edu>]

Hello,

The Tau build is an experimental one that is not widely used.   It may take us a little while to unravel the issue you ran across.  The typical process for analyzing performance of Charm++ application relies on the Projections tool (http://charm.cs.illinois.edu/manuals/html/projections/manual.html).  Please let us know if that is sufficient for your purposes.

On 07/21/2015 11:08 AM, Hynninen, Antti-Pekka wrote:

I compiled Charm++ (6.6.1) with TAU (2.24.0) on Titan using:

./build charm++ gemini_gni-crayxe-persistent-smp -optimize

./build Tau gemini_gni-crayxe-persistent-smp --tau-makefile=$TAU_MAKEFILE --no-build-shared -optimize

I then compile the "simplearrayhello" example from Charm++ (6.6.1) library using:

make OPTS='-tracemode Tau'

When I run the example with more than one thread it crashes:

--------------------------------------------------------------

hynninen@titan-login7:/lustre/atlas/scratch/hynninen/stf006> aprun -n1 -N1 -d16 ./hello +ppn 2

Charm++> Running on Gemini (GNI) with 1 processes

Charm++> static SMSG

Charm++> memory pool init block size: 8MB, total memory pool limit 0MB (0 means no limit)

Charm++> memory pool registered memory limit: 200000MB, send limit: 100000MB

Charm++> only comm thread send/recv messages

Charm++> Cray TLB page size: 8192K

Charm++> Running in SMP mode: numNodes 1,  2 worker threads per process

Charm++> The comm. thread both sends and receives messages

Converse/Charm++ Commit ID: v6.6.1-0-g74a2cc5-namd-charm-6.6.1-build-2015-Mar-15-209687

Trace: traceroot: ./hello

CharmLB> Load balancer assumes all CPUs are same.

Charm++> Running on 1 unique compute nodes (16-way SMP).

Running Hello on 2 processors for 5 elements

Hello 0 created

Hello 1 created

Hello 2 created

Hello 3 created

Hello 4 created

Hi[17] from element 0

Hi[18] from element 1

[19071:0-0] TAU: Runtime overlap: found Hello::SayHi(int hiNo)::155 (0x2aab741ae790) on the stack, but stop called on Idle (0x100000a43b0)

Hi[19] from element 2

./hello() [0x201c126b]

./hello(Tau_stop_timer+0x196) [0x201c4796]

./hello(traceCommonEndIdle+0x57) [0x200c5237]

./hello(CcdRaiseCondition+0xf5) [0x20197b35]

./hello(CsdScheduleForever+0xf2) [0x20190ff2]

./hello(CsdScheduler+0x2d) [0x201912ed]

./hello() [0x2018f282]

./hello() [0x2018f705]

/lib64/libpthread.so.0(+0x7806) [0x2aaaaaeea806]

/lib64/libc.so.6(clone+0x6d) [0x2aaaafcb964d]

TAU: signal 6 on 0 - calling TAU_PROFILE_EXIT()...

TAU: done.

Application 8873155 exit codes: 1

Application 8873155 resources: utime ~0s, stime ~1s, Rss ~15900, inblocks ~11825, outblocks ~26705

--------------------------------------------------------------

The crash happens at program exit before trace/profile is written. Trace data is written for thread 0, but not for other threads. The example runs fine when using a single thread and when not profiling with TAU.

Similar behavior is observed with all other Charm++ programs I have tried (e.g. NAMD and self-written "hello world").

--

Antti-Pekka Hynninen

email: hynninena AT ornl.gov

phone: 865-241-6123

Scientific Computing

Oak Ridge National Laboratory

_______________________________________________
charm mailing list
charm AT cs.uiuc.edu
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/charm