Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

charm - [charm] c++11 support on Cray

charm AT lists.cs.illinois.edu

Subject: Charm++ parallel programming system

List archive

[charm] c++11 support on Cray


Chronological Thread 
  • From: "Abrams,Cameron" <cfa22 AT drexel.edu>
  • To: "charm AT cs.illinois.edu" <charm AT cs.illinois.edu>
  • Subject: [charm] c++11 support on Cray
  • Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2020 19:18:35 +0000
  • Accept-language: en-US
  • Arc-authentication-results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=drexel.edu; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=drexel.edu; dkim=pass header.d=drexel.edu; arc=none
  • Arc-message-signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=FY9tGFPAXPMja1c26VK/s/RPtvg2sIkAqkH+IZ5DjZI=; b=eOEtZpC5qjzubKDI2koEoW2KOs9f5TVAt8B1E+65VfJiBHFk9DbrYdOr46ma1nbLg6RSDIysw48QUUxiOQ5YwSnK+P5oYBLZU3NyVyhb/SzJIrK6RwGiF66duqLEIIVA5wK0xLkUebj1MLa1k6I6turg0yAtHdnC3w20VFfVCQ/XXwiOfHV3bGoAS1S1Vu1lqzePJiua5IPsU89XyIwrgTr+gtyMk24s7TFEsyP6ZTsPVe/IxSAy6b+Xbcpmpw7sAZaYxFixVQKA/9s4OcYP6oP6+Vsh9i/iCcSSYg9zXTz1iL7+75WjvjsyfBNMZIVgVZv0DCHoddaLBoP0CsR9cg==
  • Arc-seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=j6cREaAc7p9NPzKj/gu6oymn5eghTvUyhYhai5RorR72dMWlQuy0MWjpaPsPlRD9awyzXg/qMSCM2q5CuAkuYhUsGsWWD6a7t3yHkfG1XtRtatfzmopS6qcP/QFLYIbNycCNu9mVLO27JpgSYjZhj9fjgElaTL1SZWB5UJ/lscnZnJG7iCINztxrtA+yh7tUp+B14iVvnH73GwfBtNWl7taMHzNoS5k4KPSae483SRdlq1GjMrSHBWWBIxRpRQWOC5dC6yY2MeqmrAmr3OYZAscaR8Eo9p5GwRWAoMf5VWsOed5UggsJnWjXo9qq4ITvnhYo6ueYw7Rb8+5x4lACSQ==
  • Authentication-results: illinois.edu; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=cfa22 AT drexel.edu; dkim=pass header.d=drexel0.onmicrosoft.com header.s=selector2-drexel0-onmicrosoft-com; dmarc=none

Hello,

I’m trying to compile charm++ 6.8.2 (for NAMD 2.13) on a Cray XC40.  The Cray compiler flag to enable c++11 support is “-hstd=c++11”, not “-h std=c++11” as is indicated in the configure scripts for charm++.  When I edit both configure and configure.in to reflect this, the c++11 support test for CC indicates “yes”, but the build still fails right at that point.  As best as I can see, this does not result in a “strictpass”.  I’m not sure what else I should look at to get this to work, so any advice is helpful.

Thanks,
Cameron

 

 

Cameron F Abrams

Professor and Head

Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering

Drexel University

o 215 895 2231

 




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.

Top of Page