Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

gang-of-4-patterns - Re: [gang-of-4-patterns] [patterns-discussion] Messaging Design Pattern and transparent access to distributed components

gang-of-4-patterns AT lists.cs.illinois.edu

Subject: Design Patterns discussion

List archive

Re: [gang-of-4-patterns] [patterns-discussion] Messaging Design Pattern and transparent access to distributed components


Chronological Thread 
  • From: "Thomas Mercer-Hursh, Ph.D." <thomas AT cintegrity.com>
  • To: phillip henry <ph1ll1phenry AT yahoo.com>
  • Cc: gang-of-4-patterns AT cs.uiuc.edu, telecom-patterns AT cs.uiuc.edu, ipc-patterns AT cs.uiuc.edu, patterns-discussion AT cs.uiuc.edu
  • Subject: Re: [gang-of-4-patterns] [patterns-discussion] Messaging Design Pattern and transparent access to distributed components
  • Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2010 15:59:23 -0700
  • List-archive: <http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/gang-of-4-patterns>
  • List-id: Design Patterns discussion <gang-of-4-patterns.cs.uiuc.edu>
  • Organization: Computing Integrity, Inc.

The big flaw I see here, right off the top, is the assumption that messages always have replies. There are many examples of fire-and-forget messaging.
--

======================================================================
Consulting in Architecture-Driven Modernization and Transformation
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Thomas Mercer-Hursh, Ph.D. email:
thomas AT cintegrity.com
Computing Integrity, Inc. voice: 510-233-5400
60 Belvedere Avenue fax: 510-233-5446
Point Richmond, CA 94801-4023 url: http://www.cintegrity.com
======================================================================





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page