Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

k-user - Re: [K-user] What does the [structural] attribute accomplish?

k-user AT lists.cs.illinois.edu

Subject: K-user mailing list

List archive

Re: [K-user] What does the [structural] attribute accomplish?


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Dorel Lucanu <dlucanu AT info.uaic.ro>
  • To: k-user AT cs.uiuc.edu
  • Subject: Re: [K-user] What does the [structural] attribute accomplish?
  • Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2013 08:43:38 +0300
  • List-archive: <http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/k-user/>
  • List-id: <k-user.cs.uiuc.edu>

The split of the rules in structural/computational is from the theoretical point of view: the operational semantics is given by applying the computational rules modulo the structural ones.
The compilation is not affected now by this classification.
Indeed, in order to build a model that approximates the theoretical one, you have to use the transition tag or the "-transition" option.

Dorel


On 7/17/13 1:17 AM, Emmanuel Castro wrote:
It is stated in K samples that structural rules do not count as transitions. Practically it seems that, transitions count only when rules are tagged [transition] or when we add them to the -transition option of Kompile.

Does adding [structural] is purely conventional, or does it yield to a special way of compiling rules?

Manu


_______________________________________________
k-user mailing list
k-user AT cs.uiuc.edu
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/k-user




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page