k-user AT lists.cs.illinois.edu
Subject: K-user mailing list
List archive
- From: Dorel Lucanu <dlucanu AT info.uaic.ro>
- To: k-user AT cs.uiuc.edu
- Subject: Re: [K-user] What does the [structural] attribute accomplish?
- Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2013 08:43:38 +0300
- List-archive: <http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/k-user/>
- List-id: <k-user.cs.uiuc.edu>
The split of the rules in structural/computational is from the
theoretical point of view: the operational semantics is given by
applying the computational rules modulo the structural ones. The compilation is not affected now by this classification. Indeed, in order to build a model that approximates the theoretical one, you have to use the transition tag or the "-transition" option. Dorel On 7/17/13 1:17 AM, Emmanuel Castro
wrote:
It is stated in K samples that structural rules do
not count as transitions. Practically it seems that, transitions
count only when rules are tagged [transition] or when we add
them to the -transition option of Kompile.
Does adding [structural] is purely conventional,
or does it yield to a special way of compiling rules?
Manu
_______________________________________________ k-user mailing list k-user AT cs.uiuc.edu http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/k-user |
- [K-user] What does the [structural] attribute accomplish?, Emmanuel Castro, 07/16/2013
- Re: [K-user] What does the [structural] attribute accomplish?, Dorel Lucanu, 07/17/2013
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.