k-user AT lists.cs.illinois.edu
Subject: K-user mailing list
List archive
- From: Omar Duhaiby <3omarz AT gmail.com>
- To: Chris Hathhorn <chathhorn AT gmail.com>
- Cc: Traian Șerbănuță <traian.serbanuta AT gmail.com>, "k-user AT cs.uiuc.edu" <k-user AT cs.uiuc.edu>
- Subject: Re: [K-user] Thread Matching
- Date: Tue, 13 May 2014 00:31:44 +0300
- List-archive: <http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/k-user/>
- List-id: <k-user.cs.uiuc.edu>
I like this solution. It is very useful. Thanks for sharing it. I just have to tweak it a little to fit my problem.
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 12:25 AM, Chris Hathhorn <chathhorn AT gmail.com> wrote:
Well, if you want to synchronize all threads with a certain group id,
you can do it by passing a token among the threads in that group. You
can use something like this to pass the token between threads with
consecutive ids:
rule
<k> join(GId:Int, TId:Int, (1 => 0)) ... </k>
<k> join(GId:Int, TId':Int, (0 => 1)) ...</k>
when TId +Int 1 ==Int TId'
You'll probably want to pass the token between the threads twice ("up
and down") -- the first pass you're doing the synchronization, and on
the second pass you know each thread has actually reached the
synchronization point.
Hope this helps -- I'm not sure it exactly relates to your situation,
but I suspect you'll probably need to do something similar.
Chris
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 4:14 PM, Omar Duhaiby <3omarz AT gmail.com> wrote:
> Could you please elaborate on that? I couldn't understand what you mean by
> low ids and high ids, and what is up and down? Do you mean a tree of
> threads?
>
>
> On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 11:55 PM, Chris Hathhorn <chathhorn AT gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> FWIW, I've done this before by passing a "token" up and down the
>> threads I wanted to synchronize (from low ids to high ids and back
>> again). You match the threads two at a time to pass the token, and
>> when the token comes back down, every thread knows the other threads
>> have reached the synchronization point.
>>
>> Chris
>>
>> On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 3:47 PM, Omar Duhaiby <3omarz AT gmail.com> wrote:
>> > That is a good idea but I need to delete only the threads which have
>> > <parentId> ManagerId </parentId>
>> >
>> >
>> > On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 10:31 PM, Traian Florin Şerbănuţă
>> > <traian.serbanuta AT fmi.unibuc.ro> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> The simplest way to achieve this would be to have a special cell
>> >> wrapping
>> >> all threads in question.
>> >>
>> >> Then, you can write a rule like:
>> >>
>> >> rule <threads>
>> >> <thread>...
>> >> <k> parallelThreadManager(0) => V ...</k>
>> >> <tid> ManagerId </tid>
>> >> ...</thread>
>> >> (_ => .)
>> >> </threads>
>> >>
>> >> not sure whether you can rethink your configuration this way, whough.
>> >>
>> >> 2014-05-12 16:26 GMT+03:00 Omar Duhaiby <3omarz AT gmail.com>:
>> >>>
>> >>> I have parallel sibling threads assigned to a parent thread by a cell
>> >>> called "parentId". I want anyone of them to match and the rest to be
>> >>> deleted. I did this:
>> >>>
>> >>> rule <thread>...
>> >>> <k> parallelThreadManager(0) => V ...</k>
>> >>> <tid> ManagerId </tid>
>> >>> ...</thread>
>> >>> (<thread>...
>> >>> <k> V:Val </k>
>> >>> <parentId> ManagerId </parentId>
>> >>> ...</thread> => .)
>> >>> (<thread>...
>> >>> <parentId> ManagerId </parentId>
>> >>> ...</thread> => . )
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> The last bit of the rule should delete other threads, but it only
>> >>> deletes
>> >>> one such thread. I need it to delete ALL such threads. How can I do
>> >>> that?
>> >>>
>> >>> _______________________________________________
>> >>> k-user mailing list
>> >>> k-user AT cs.uiuc.edu
>> >>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/k-user
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > k-user mailing list
>> > k-user AT cs.uiuc.edu
>> > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/k-user
>> >
>
>
- [K-user] Thread Matching, Omar Duhaiby, 05/12/2014
- Re: [K-user] Thread Matching, Traian Florin Şerbănuţă, 05/12/2014
- Re: [K-user] Thread Matching, Omar Duhaiby, 05/12/2014
- Re: [K-user] Thread Matching, Chris Hathhorn, 05/12/2014
- Re: [K-user] Thread Matching, Omar Duhaiby, 05/12/2014
- Re: [K-user] Thread Matching, Chris Hathhorn, 05/12/2014
- Re: [K-user] Thread Matching, Omar Duhaiby, 05/12/2014
- Re: [K-user] Thread Matching, Chris Hathhorn, 05/12/2014
- Re: [K-user] Thread Matching, Omar Duhaiby, 05/12/2014
- Re: [K-user] Thread Matching, Chris Hathhorn, 05/12/2014
- Re: [K-user] Thread Matching, Omar Duhaiby, 05/12/2014
- Re: [K-user] Thread Matching, Traian Florin Şerbănuţă, 05/12/2014
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.