k-user AT lists.cs.illinois.edu
Subject: K-user mailing list
List archive
- From: Daniel Schnetzer Fava <danielsf AT ifi.uio.no>
- To: Markus Knecht <markus.knecht85 AT gmail.com>
- Cc: Daniel Schnetzer Fava <danielsf AT ifi.uio.no>, "k-user AT lists.cs.illinois.edu" <k-user AT lists.cs.illinois.edu>
- Subject: Re: [[K-user] ] Staging the evaluation of rules
- Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2018 13:07:37 +0000
- Accept-language: en-US, nb-NO
- Authentication-results: illinois.edu; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=danielsf AT ifi.uio.no
Seems like size(BQ) is not being evaluated.
If I replace:
rule <k> IsSelBranchEnabled( let Z:Id = channel(Ref:Int) <- V:Val in T:Term ) => size(BQ) >=Int 1 ... </k>
by:
rule <k> IsSelBranchEnabled( let Z:Id = channel(Ref:Int) <- V:Val in T:Term ) => size(BQ) ... </k>
the result is simply: size(BQ)
But if I replace it by
rule <k> IsSelBranchEnabled( let Z:Id = channel(Ref:Int) <- V:Val in T:Term ) => 0 >=Int 1 ... </k>
the result is “false” as expected.
Daniel
On 5 Jan 2018, at 11:39, Markus Knecht <markus.knecht85 AT gmail.com> wrote:
It seems that
size ( ListItem ( ListItem ( 42 ) ListItem ( .Map ) ListItem ( .Set ) ) )
cannot be evaluated and thus >=Int is stuck, the question is why, I do not see it, especially as you have the same _expression_ size(BQ) in the requires where it seems to work.
It may have something to do that Int >=Int Int is already a Bool even in its unevaluated form, but that is unlikely as Int >=Int Int is defined as a function and should match anywhere anyways.
If you use:
rule <k> R:Bool ~> selFindEnBs(BTail, L) => selFindEnBs(BTail, L ListItem(R)) </k>
Instead of the true/false version, does the unevaluated Term end up in the ListItem of selFindEnBs ? atleast the rewriting would continue but will be stuck later, so no solution but maybe it helps pinpoint the problem.
Daniel Schnetzer Fava <danielsf AT ifi.uio.no> schrieb am Fr., 5. Jan. 2018 um 11:13 Uhr:
Hi Markus,
Thanks for the reply.
What error do you get?Does the evaluation get Stuck at aBoolean ~> selFindEnBs(...) , or does IsSelBranchEnabled(BHead) fails to evaluate to a boolean? or did it not kompile at all?
IsSelBranchEnabled(BHead) fails to evaluate to a boolean.
It does get evaluated to a certain degree, but it stops here, and does not evaluate the >=Int
size ( ListItem ( ListItem ( 42 ) ListItem ( .Map ) ListItem ( .Set ) ) ) >=Int 1
Here is the rule for IsSelBranchEnabled:
syntax Bool ::= "IsSelBranchEnabled" "(" GChan ")"rule <k> IsSelBranchEnabled( let Z:Id = channel(Ref:Int) <- V:Val in T:Term ) => size(BQ) >=Int 1 ... </k><chan><ref> Ref </ref><type> _ </type><forward> FQ </forward><backward> BQ </backward></chan>requires (EotInFQ(FQ) ==Bool false) // channel is openandBool(size(FQ) +Int size(BQ) >Int 0) // channel is async
is Bool declared as KResult [do you have syntax KResult ::= Bool somwhere]
Bool is declared as KResult.
Thanks again,
Daniel
PS.Independent tips:
I don't think the brackets before => are necessary
instead of true/false ~> ... you could capture both in one statement with Res:Bool ~> …
Great! I appreciate the comments. Often, even though I manage to accomplish what I need/want, I get the feeling that there is a better way of doing it.
On 4 Jan 2018, at 16:55, Markus Knecht <markus.knecht85 AT gmail.com> wrote:
What error do you get?Does the evaluation get Stuck at aBoolean ~> selFindEnBs(...) , or does IsSelBranchEnabled(BHead) fails to evaluate to a boolean? or did it not kompile at all?
Some things to check:if something follows selFindEnBs you need to add ... before </k>.is Bool declared as KResult [do you have syntax KResult ::= Bool somwhere]
Independent tips:
I don't think the brackets before => are necessary
instead of true/false ~> ... you could capture both in one statement with Res:Bool ~> ...
Daniel Schnetzer Fava <danielsf AT ifi.uio.no> schrieb am Do., 4. Jan. 2018 um 16:25 Uhr:
Hi,
I am trying to write a rule that first evaluates another, then evaluates itself.I think I ought to be using ~> but I am not sure exactly how.
Here is some attempt that does not seem to work:
rule <k> selFindEnBs({ BHead } BTail, L:List) =>IsSelBranchEnabled(BHead) ~> selFindEnBs(BTail, L) </k>rule <k> (true ~> selFindEnBs(BTail, L)) =>selFindEnBs(BTail, L ListItem(true)) </k>rule <k> (false ~> selFindEnBs(BTail, L)) =>selFindEnBs(BTail, L ListItem(false)) </k>
The goal is to have the result of “IsSelBranchEnabled(BHead)” appended to the list Land then continue evaluating selFindEnBs on BTail.
Any help is highly appreciated!
Thanks,
Daniel
- [[K-user] ] Staging the evaluation of rules, Daniel Schnetzer Fava, 01/04/2018
- Re: [[K-user] ] Staging the evaluation of rules, Markus Knecht, 01/04/2018
- Re: [[K-user] ] Staging the evaluation of rules, Daniel Schnetzer Fava, 01/05/2018
- Re: [[K-user] ] Staging the evaluation of rules, Markus Knecht, 01/05/2018
- Re: [[K-user] ] Staging the evaluation of rules, Daniel Schnetzer Fava, 01/05/2018
- Re: [[K-user] ] Staging the evaluation of rules, Daniel Schnetzer Fava, 01/05/2018
- Re: [[K-user] ] Staging the evaluation of rules, Daniel Schnetzer Fava, 01/05/2018
- Re: [[K-user] ] Staging the evaluation of rules, Daniel Schnetzer Fava, 01/05/2018
- Re: [[K-user] ] Staging the evaluation of rules, Markus Knecht, 01/05/2018
- Re: [[K-user] ] Staging the evaluation of rules, Daniel Schnetzer Fava, 01/05/2018
- Re: [[K-user] ] Staging the evaluation of rules, Markus Knecht, 01/05/2018
- [[K-user] ] size(ListItem(42)) does not reduce, Daniel Schnetzer Fava, 01/05/2018
- Re: [[K-user] ] Staging the evaluation of rules, Daniel Schnetzer Fava, 01/05/2018
- Re: [[K-user] ] Staging the evaluation of rules, Daniel Schnetzer Fava, 01/05/2018
- Re: [[K-user] ] Staging the evaluation of rules, Daniel Schnetzer Fava, 01/05/2018
- Re: [[K-user] ] Staging the evaluation of rules, Markus Knecht, 01/05/2018
- Re: [[K-user] ] Staging the evaluation of rules, Daniel Schnetzer Fava, 01/05/2018
- Re: [[K-user] ] Staging the evaluation of rules, Markus Knecht, 01/04/2018
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.