Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

charm - Re: [charm] Charm++ tests failure

charm AT lists.cs.illinois.edu

Subject: Charm++ parallel programming system

List archive

Re: [charm] Charm++ tests failure


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Jim Phillips <jim AT ks.uiuc.edu>
  • To: Abhinav S Bhatele <bhatele AT illinois.edu>
  • Cc: Mark JOHNSON <johnson AT ill.fr>, charm AT cs.uiuc.edu, mudingay AT ill.fr, pellegrini <pellegrini AT ill.fr>
  • Subject: Re: [charm] Charm++ tests failure
  • Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2010 16:05:27 -0500 (CDT)
  • List-archive: <http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/charm>
  • List-id: CHARM parallel programming system <charm.cs.uiuc.edu>


I think this is just ++local being broken in the ibverbs version.

Try again using a real nodelist file.

-Jim


On Mon, 14 Jun 2010, Abhinav S Bhatele wrote:

Hello Eric,

The ibverbs issue you pointed out might take some time before it gets
resolved.

In the meantime, if you want to get NAMD up and running, I would recommend
removing
ibverbs from your build line (at step 2) and compiling afresh.

- Abhinav


On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 11:11 AM, pellegrini
<pellegrini AT ill.fr>
wrote:

Hello,

we are trying to install NAMD on our new DALCO cluster made of 43
8-cores Intel Xeon cpus (Nehalem) connected through InfiniBand. We
followed the installation notes but we fails to make charm++ work. The
build was successful but when performing some tests we got no results.
We are using charm-6.1.3 that comes along
with NAMD-2.7b2. We did the following from the NAMD directory:

1 cd charm-6.1.3
2 env MPICXX=mpicxx ./build charm++ net-linux-x86_64 pgcc
--basedir=/usr/pgi/linux86-64/2010/mpi/mvapich --no-build-shared pgf90
ibverbs --no-build-shared -j32 -O2 -DCMK_OTIMIZE --> the build was
successful
3 cd tests/charm++/megatests
4 make clean
5 make pgm --> the make was successfull
6 charmrun ++local +p4 ./pgm and from here we get:

Charmrun> IBVERBS version of charmrun
Charmrun: Bad initnode data length. Aborting

Based on this, the build of NAMD works but once again the tests are
failing. We think that both failures are related.

Would you have any idea of what is going wrong or if we did some
mistakes when building charm++ ?

thank you very much

best regards

Eric Pellegrini




_______________________________________________
charm mailing list
charm AT cs.uiuc.edu
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/charm




--
Abhinav S Bhatele
My work: http://charm.cs.illinois.edu/~bhatele/phd





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page