charm AT lists.cs.illinois.edu
Subject: Charm++ parallel programming system
List archive
- From: Eric Bohm <ebohm AT illinois.edu>
- To: Yogesh Sonawane <sonawane.yogesh19 AT gmail.com>
- Cc: charm AT cs.uiuc.edu
- Subject: Re: [charm] [ppl] Use of malloc in PUP...
- Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 09:13:20 -0500
- List-archive: <http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/charm>
- List-id: CHARM parallel programming system <charm.cs.uiuc.edu>
|
Yes. You can use any allocator in an isUnpacking() block. Just
exercise the usual care to be consistent in your use of the matching
destructor (free instead of delete) in your destructor. On 04/12/2012 05:22 AM, Yogesh Sonawane wrote: Hello, Can we use malloc to allocate memory in PUP routine instead of new operator,...? Thank you.. Yogesh. _______________________________________________ charm mailing list charm AT cs.uiuc.edu http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/charm _______________________________________________ ppl mailing list ppl AT cs.uiuc.edu http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/ppl |
- [charm] Use of malloc in PUP..., Yogesh Sonawane, 04/12/2012
- Re: [charm] [ppl] Use of malloc in PUP..., Eric Bohm, 04/12/2012
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.