k-user AT lists.cs.illinois.edu
Subject: K-user mailing list
List archive
- From: Radu Mereuta <headness13 AT gmail.com>
- To: Robby Findler <robby AT eecs.northwestern.edu>
- Cc: k-user AT cs.uiuc.edu
- Subject: Re: [K-user] performance of kompile?
- Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2012 20:19:41 +0300
- List-archive: <http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/k-user/>
- List-id: <k-user.cs.uiuc.edu>
HI Robby,
I have an idea of what it happens, but we need to test it first. We kept developing and adding new stuff to K and I think we added too much. We need to rethink what we add by default, because right now everything is added by default.
Will get back to you in a day or two, hopefully with a solution.
Radu
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 8:05 PM, Robby Findler <robby AT eecs.northwestern.edu> wrote:
Hi all:
I'm seeing surprisingly slow performance from 'kompile' when I run
it on a simple file. I think I must have something set up wrong, as
I've watched others use kompile and things have been much more zippy.
Here's specifically what I see, running on a mac os x 1.8 ghz core i7
machine:
$ cat imp.k
module IMP
endmodule
$ time ./k/bin/kompile imp.k
real 0m15.792s
user 0m28.005s
sys 0m0.938s
$
The "k" directory contains an unpacked version of k-latest-stable.tgz
from the k-framework.org website.
When I watch top, I see that about 10 of those 15 seconds are spent in
Java and the rest in maude.
When I try k-latest.tgz, I see the same 10 or so seconds in Java, but
then it cannot find maude. I'm not sure why.
In case it matters:
$ which java
/usr/bin/java
$ java -version
java version "1.6.0_35"
Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0_35-b10-428-11M3811)
Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 20.10-b01-428, mixed mode)
Any ideas?
tia,
Robby
_______________________________________________
k-user mailing list
k-user AT cs.uiuc.edu
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/k-user
- [K-user] performance of kompile?, Robby Findler, 09/25/2012
- Re: [K-user] performance of kompile?, Radu Mereuta, 09/25/2012
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.