Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

maude-help - Re: [Maude-help] a question about core Maude

maude-help AT lists.cs.illinois.edu

Subject: Maude-help mailing list

List archive

Re: [Maude-help] a question about core Maude


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Steven Eker <eker AT csl.sri.com>
  • To: yfu002 AT cs.fiu.edu, maude-help AT peepal.cs.uiuc.edu
  • Cc:
  • Subject: Re: [Maude-help] a question about core Maude
  • Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 17:13:09 -0700
  • List-archive: <http://maude.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/maude-help>
  • List-id: Maude help list <maude-help.maude.cs.uiuc.edu>
  • Organization: SRI International

On Wednesday 28 July 2004 01:44 pm,
yfu002 AT cs.fiu.edu
wrote:
> Dear Maude supporters,
>
> I am using Core Maude 2.1. I define tokens for first order linear time
> temporal logic, which is shown in attached file. When I try to reduce a
> first order LTL formula, I get nothing. This is shown in the attached .gif
> file. Would you please take a look at that file? Thanks in advance.
>
>
> --Yujian Fu

There are a number of problems; first

eq D ( E ) : D{E} .
eq E ( true ) : E{true} .
eq E ( false ) : E{false} .

in fmod FOLTL do not have = symbols so Maude does not recgnized the end of
equations or the end of the module.

Next the term

V- green : [] ( D ( green ) /\ E ( true ) -> <> ( d ( green ) \/ t ( false )
)) .

makes use of green which is declared to be a variable in another module (not
the current one) and t which appears to be an undeclared operator.

Steven





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page