Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

charm - Re: [charm] When to migrate

charm AT lists.cs.illinois.edu

Subject: Charm++ parallel programming system

List archive

Re: [charm] When to migrate


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Phil Miller <unmobile AT gmail.com>
  • To: "Van Der Wijngaart, Rob F" <rob.f.van.der.wijngaart AT intel.com>
  • Cc: "Chandrasekar, Kavitha" <kchndrs2 AT illinois.edu>, "White, Samuel T" <white67 AT illinois.edu>, "Totoni, Ehsan" <ehsan.totoni AT intel.com>, "Langer, Akhil" <akhil.langer AT intel.com>, Harshitha Menon <harshitha.menon AT gmail.com>, "charm AT cs.uiuc.edu" <charm AT cs.uiuc.edu>
  • Subject: Re: [charm] When to migrate
  • Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2016 12:36:00 -0600


On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 12:27 PM, Van Der Wijngaart, Rob F <rob.f.van.der.wijngaart AT intel.com> wrote:

One last question. If I have an AMPI code that I have linked with commonLB and that I run with a valid +balancer argument, but I do not call AMPI_Migrate anywhere in the code, does the runtime still collect load balance information? If so, is there a charmrun command that I can give that prevents the runtime from doing that? I know I could use these functions:

AMPI_Load_stop_measure(void)

AMPI_Load_start_measure(void)

but I prefer to specify it on the command line (otherwise I need to supply yet another input parameter and parse it in the code). Thanks!

 



If you run the program with +LBOff, instrumentation will be initially disabled. It will be as if Load_stop_measure() were called at the beginning of execution.



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.

Top of Page